FLUTTER ECOSYSTEM

xamantra/relative_scale

RelativeScale는 다양한 기기에서 동일한 물리적 크기를 달성하기 위해 Flutter 위젯용 간단한 사용자 정의 크기 시스템입니다.

relative_scale 프로젝트 이미지
Stars
18
Forks
1
최근 푸시(UTC)
2021. 3. 5.
프로젝트 상태
활성
xamantra GitHub avatar
GITHUB User

xamantra ↗

flutter dev

xamantraPhilippines공식 웹사이트 ↗
언어Dart

기술 주제

사용 중인 의존성

의존성 목록 2 개
  • flutter{"sdk":"flutter"}
  • flutter_test개발 의존성{"sdk":"flutter"}

원본 README

아래는 영문 원문 스냅샷입니다. 최신 내용은 GitHub에서 확인하세요.

README 펼치기 / 접기

https://i.imgur.com/yB3GZ9j.png

RelativeScale is a simple custom sizing system for flutter widgets to achieve the same physical sizes across different devices.

Pub Version CI https://codecov.io/gh/xamantra/relative_scale/branch/master/graph/badge.svg likes health popularity GitHub stars style: effective dart GitHub license GitHub last commit


Usage

It is VERY easy to use.

  • sy(value) and sx(value)

  • Example:

    • sy(10) - size relative to screen height.
    • sx(10) - size relative to screen width.
  • RelativeBuilder - A builder widget that provides the scaling methods sy and sx.

  • RelativeScale (deprecated) - A StatefulWidget mixin that provides the scaling methods sy and sx. It is highly recommended to use RelativeBuilder.


Example

RelativeBuilder example.

class Example extends StatelessWidget {
  @override
  Widget build(BuildContext context) {
    return RelativeBuilder(
      builder: (context, height, width, sy, sx) {
        return Scaffold(
          appBar: AppBar(
            title: Text(
              'App Bar Title',
              style: TextStyle(fontSize: sy(13)),
            ),
          ),
          body: Container(
            height: height,
            width: width,
            child: Text(
              'Body Text',
              style: TextStyle(fontSize: sy(11)),
            ),
          ),
        );
      },
    );
  }
}

Preview

The base screen size for these widgets is 480 x 800. The source code for this preview app is here.

Scaled with RelativeScale:

Scaled

Now, look at these scaled widgets with RelativeScale. There is a difference, yeah, but that's because of the system scaled sizes like the AppBar (look at the appbar's height :) ). Now let's forget about that and focus on the texts and the rectangle containers. They are the same sizes.

Normal scaling from a flutter:

Unscaled

Now, for unscaled sizes, no RelativeScale at all. Well, that's quite obvious :). Look at the texts on the last image, they are very small comparing to the first image. And the rectangle containers, very big difference.

The full example is in the Example section.


Scaling Notes

For instance, you have a container widget like this:

Container(
    height: 300,
    width: 500,
)

and you implemented RelativeScale:

Container(
    height: sy(300),
    width: sx(500),
)

they will not be the same size anymore, using relative scaler will make your sizes a bit bigger. But the hard work will payoff after adjusting your sizes because your app will now have the same widget sizes in every devices.

Please note that these scaler methods are relative to screen size. So basically in this case sy(50) and sx(50) is NOT the same size.

Also, another thing to note is that if you use sy for height and sx for width (or vice-versa), you'll get widgets with the same ratio (not size) which is still useful. The Scaled preview image above uses only sy, and containers and text have the same size across different screens.

If you want to make a perfect Square container, DON'T do this:
Container(
    height: sy(300),
    width: sx(300),
)
// Yeah they are the same value "300", but they are not the same unit 'cause you used "sx" on the width.
DO this instead:
Container(
    height: sy(300), // or sx(value)
    width: sy(300), // or sx(value)
)

Portrait & Landscape

The library doesn't support orientation yet. If you designed your app for portrait and the user rotates the app to landscape view, the sizes will be messed up. So if you want to use this library, it's highly recommended you lock the rotation. Or if your app should adapt to orientation, DO NOT use this library, there are a lot of alternatives.