パッケージ、リポジトリ、アプリカテゴリを検索

パッケージ詳細v1.2.0

fluttersdk_wind_diagnostics_contracts

Flutter デバッグツールおよび AI エージェント (MCP) 用の Wind UI ウィジェット状態契約。fluttersdk_wind で実装されたゼロ依存の抽象インターフェースで、fluttersdk_dusk で使用される。

AndroidiOSLinuxmacOSWebWindows
30日間ダウンロード
17.9万
いいね数
1
Pub ポイント
150

パッケージをインストール

flutter pub add fluttersdk_wind_diagnostics_contracts

パッケージ概要

公開情報に基づく選定ガイドです。参考としてご利用ください。

FlutterでWind UIウィジェットの状態契約を定義するためのゼロ依存の抽象インターフェースで、デバッグツールおよびAIエージェント(MCP)のサポートを目的としています。fluttersdk_windに実装され、fluttersdk_duskによって使用されており、複数プラットフォーム間での一貫した診断を可能にします。このパッケージは、開発およびデバッグ中にウィジェットの状態を検査・分析するための標準化された方法を提供し、ツールとエージェント間の相互運用性を促進します。Android、iOS、Linux、macOS、Web、Windowsをすべてサポートする、プラットフォーム非依存な仕組みです。

用途

  • Widget の状態に関する問題のデバッグ
  • AI駆動のコード補助を有効にする
  • 開発者ツールとの統合
  • テスト中のUI動作の分析
  • 自動診断のサポート
  • クロスプラットフォームデバッグの支援

主な機能

  • ゼロ依存設計
  • ウィジェット状態の抽象インターフェース
  • プラットフォームに依存しない実装
  • AIエージェント(MCP)向けに設計
  • デバッグツール統合用に設計
  • 一貫した契約定義

適している対象

  • 高度なデバッグツールを使用するFlutter開発者
  • AI補助開発機能を構築するチーム
  • ツールおよびIDEプラグイン開発者
  • クロスプラットフォームUIテストツール
  • デバッグフレームワークの貢献者

注意事項

  • fluttersdk_wind および fluttersdk_dusk との統合が必要です
  • アプリロジックでの直接使用を想定していません
  • 外部ツールエコシステムに依存しています
  • 診断および分析ワークフローに限定
  • 隔離状態では実行時機能がありません

元の README

関連するソースリポジトリの README 原文のスナップショットです。最新の内容はリポジトリをご覧ください。

Wind Diagnostics Contracts Logo

Wind Diagnostics Contracts

Wind UI widget state contracts for Flutter debug-tooling and AI agents (MCP).
Zero-dep abstract resolver interface plus process-global registry. The plugin_platform_interface pattern, applied to UI framework and debug tooling decoupling. ~80 LoC, frozen v1 contract.

pub package CI License: MIT pub points GitHub stars

Documentation · pub.dev · Issues


Use cases

This package is the integration seam for any tool that needs runtime Wind UI state without pulling Wind into its compile graph:

  • LLM-agent E2E testing for Flutter: MCP servers and AI assistants (Claude Code, Cursor, Copilot) that drive a Flutter app need structured widget state (className, breakpoint, brightness, platform, states, colors) per Element, not screenshots. This package is the typed contract those tools read.
  • DevTools extensions: build a custom Wind inspector tab in Dart DevTools without a hard fluttersdk_wind dependency that drags the rendering surface into the extension bundle.
  • E2E drivers (fluttersdk_dusk, patrol_mcp, marionette_mcp, custom): emit a wind: block in snapshot YAML / JSON without importing Wind. Tests stop breaking when a className is renamed because the contract surfaces semantic state, not selectors.
  • Tailwind-on-Flutter authors: any styling library that follows Wind's className convention can implement this contract to expose its state to the same debug-tooling ecosystem.

Why this package exists

Wind UI (pub.dev) exposes runtime widget state (className, breakpoint, brightness, platform, states, bgColor, textColor) that debug-tooling packages such as fluttersdk_dusk (pub.dev) embed in their snapshot YAML so LLM agents can reason about the rendered tree.

Shipping that handoff through fluttersdk_wind's own surface would force every debug-tool to compile-time depend on Wind, dragging the full rendering surface and bumping debug-tool builds on every Wind release. Shipping it the other way (Wind depending on each debug tool) is even worse.

This package breaks the loop. Both sides depend on the abstract contract here; neither side imports the other.

                    fluttersdk_wind_diagnostics_contracts
                              |
              +---------------+---------------+
              |                               |
       fluttersdk_wind                  fluttersdk_dusk
       (registers a resolver)         (reads the resolver
                                       at snapshot time)

The pattern mirrors Flutter's *_platform_interface convention. plugin_platform_interface (the canonical precedent) sits at 4.97M downloads on pub.dev for exactly this reason.


Install

flutter pub add fluttersdk_wind_diagnostics_contracts

Most consumers never add this dep by hand. fluttersdk_wind declares it as a direct production dependency, so any app that already depends on Wind picks it up transitively. Add it explicitly when you are authoring a debug-tooling package that reads Wind state without depending on Wind itself.


Usage

Registering a resolver (in fluttersdk_wind)

Wind installs its concrete resolver at app boot, gated by kDebugMode so release builds tree-shake the entire registration site:

import 'package:flutter/foundation.dart' show kDebugMode;
import 'package:fluttersdk_wind/fluttersdk_wind.dart';

void main() {
  if (kDebugMode) {
    Wind.installDebugResolver();
  }
  runApp(const MyApp());
}

Wind.installDebugResolver() is a one-liner inside fluttersdk_wind that does:

import 'package:fluttersdk_wind_diagnostics_contracts/fluttersdk_wind_diagnostics_contracts.dart';

WindDebugRegistry.register(const WindDebugResolverImpl());
Reading the resolver (in a debug-tooling package)

The consumer looks up the currently-installed resolver and calls resolve(element) per Element it wants to inspect. The resolver returns const {} for non-Wind widgets, so the walk is safe for any element:

import 'package:fluttersdk_wind_diagnostics_contracts/fluttersdk_wind_diagnostics_contracts.dart';

void emitWindBlock(StringBuffer buffer, Element element) {
  final WindDebugResolver? resolver = WindDebugRegistry.current;
  if (resolver == null) return; // wind not in this app, or release build.

  final Map<String, Object?> data = resolver.resolve(element);
  if (data.isEmpty) return; // not a Wind widget.

  buffer.writeln('wind:');
  data.forEach((key, value) {
    buffer.writeln('  $key: $value');
  });
}

The returned map's key set is documented as the v1 frozen contract (see CHANGELOG.md for the full key list).

Reading aggregate performance counters

WindDebugResolver answers per-Element questions, so it has nowhere to put a number that belongs to no single element: a cache hit rate, a build count. WindPerfResolver is a second, independent contract for exactly those, with its own registry slot. Registering one never touches the other.

final WindPerfResolver? perf = WindDebugRegistry.currentPerf;
if (perf == null) return; // wind not in this app, or the resolver was never installed.

final Map<String, Object?> stats = perf.stats();
// cacheHits, cacheMisses, cacheBypasses, cacheSize, wDivBuilds, wTextBuilds; all int.

Wind installs it with Wind.installPerfResolver(), separately from installDebugResolver(), because the two answer different questions and a host may want one without the other. Counting itself stays off until wind's own flag is set, so installing the resolver costs nothing. That method ships in the fluttersdk_wind release that pairs with this contract; a reader on an earlier wind will not find it yet.

The null is worth passing through rather than flattening to zeros: it is what lets a consumer tell "no resolver was ever registered" from "the counters really are zero".

Test seams

WindDebugRegistry exposes four @visibleForTesting helpers so debug-tool tests can register fake resolvers without going through Wind. resetForTesting() clears BOTH slots; registerForTesting and registerPerfForTesting install a fake into one each:

import 'package:flutter_test/flutter_test.dart';
import 'package:fluttersdk_wind_diagnostics_contracts/fluttersdk_wind_diagnostics_contracts.dart';

class _FakeResolver implements WindDebugResolver {
  @override
  Map<String, Object?> resolve(Element element) {
    return const <String, Object?>{
      'className': 'flex p-4',
      'breakpoint': 'lg',
      'brightness': 'light',
      'platform': 'web',
      'states': <String>['hover'],
    };
  }
}

void main() {
  setUp(() => WindDebugRegistry.resetForTesting());

  testWidgets('observe emits wind block from registry', (tester) async {
    WindDebugRegistry.registerForTesting(_FakeResolver());
    // ... rest of the test ...
  });
}

Versioning

This package follows Semantic Versioning 2.0.0. Two return-map key sets are the load-bearing contract, WindDebugResolver.resolve's and WindPerfResolver.stats's, and the same rule governs both: additive changes (new keys in the returned map) are non-breaking; renaming or removing existing keys requires a major bump. Adding a METHOD to either contract is breaking, since it breaks every implementer including the test fakes, which is why the perf counters got a second contract rather than a second method on the first.


License

MIT. See LICENSE.

カテゴリー

依存関係

依存関係一覧 1 件

ソースリポジトリ

このパッケージを使用しているプロジェクト

ランキング